The Obama nuclear policy is being criticized after President Obama conducted a Nuclear Posture Review and updated the nation’s policy on nuclear weapons. Although the new policy changes little, it still has some Congressional Republics upset. If the government were to put any fast cash into any more nuclear supplies, it would be for reactors, not for any more nukes.

Might be stark raving MAD

According to the article in TIME, the updated Obama nuclear weapons policy changes nothing regarding the default status between Russia and the U.S. Since the dawn of the Cold War, what kept a nuclear exchange from taking place between the two largest nuclear powers was something called “Mutually Assured Destruction,” wherein the nuclear deterrence held by either country would be deployed in the event of the other attacking with theirs. This means that in the event of a nuclear event, neither sides would be able to find recovery from simple payday loans due to the amount of damage that would be placed upon both sides

Non-aggression, with exceptions

Part of the updated nuclear weapons policy is that President Obama has pledged to never initiate a nuclear attack, except against states that do not participate in the Non-nuclear Proliferation Treaty. He also pledges he will never use nuclear weapons against states that aren’t known to be developing nuclear weapons. It is equally a carrot essentially – for states not to develop them – and a stick for – any that might. It implies that we may nuke any states that have gone rogue and are developing nuclear weapons. More or less, it says we won’t be nuclear aggressors, but with broad room for exceptions.

New nukes nixed

Obama also made it very clear we will be building no new nuclear weapons. Many of the hawkish Senate Republicans have balked at the idea, and our arsenal is aging in the nuclear area. We seem ok right now considering the weapons grade isotope of Plutonium, Pu-239 has a half life of 24,000 years (the amount of time an element will stay in its original form before decaying. Granted, Uranium 233 and Uranium 235 have half lives of 160,000 years and 703,800,000 years. However, what constitutes “new” isn’t defined.

Me bomb es su bomb for the Terrorists that will pay

The Obama nuclear update on our policy also includes no change to existing doctrine that states harboring or enabling terrorists will not be spared the nuclear rod in the event of an attack. Also, any country that is currently host to any of our stockpiled weapons (such as Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands and Italy) can make use of such weapons with our approval in case they seriously need to.

Iran is far away

From an article from Reuters (See: reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6362IJ20100407), Iranian President Ahmadinejad is apparently none too pleased. He said that Obama is “inexperienced and an amateur politician.” He further added that “American politicians are like cowboys. Whenever they have legal shortcomings their hands go to their guns.” The revised Obama nuclear policy, in reality, changes little.